Kebbi Govt, Ilyasu-Bashar win as Supreme Court ousts Jokolo as Emir of Gwandu

In its majority verdict, the Supreme Court held that the sacked Emir failed to exhaust the mandatory domestic dispute resolution mechanism prescribed by law, before he took the matter to court.

It held that failure of the deposed Emir to fulfill the condition precedent, invalidated the outcome of his case.

In the lead judgement that was delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim, the apex court stressed that Jokolo ought to have complied with Section 5(4) of the Kebbi State Chiefs (Appointment and Deposition) Law, which stipulated that a formal complaint must be submitted to the Governor before such litigation could be commenced.

It held that there was no evidence to show that a pre-action notice was served on the Governor of Kebbi State, a mandatory step before the such case could be filed.

Consequently, the apex court agreed with the Appellants that Jokolo’s failure to seek a resolution through administrative channels, rendered his suit incompetent.

It held that the procedural lapse equally deprived the lower courts of jurisdiction, to meddle in the dispute.

It, therefore, nullified the entire proceedings and judgments of both the trial court and the Court of Appeal.

However, in the dissenting minority judgment that was delivered by Justice Ibrahim Salami, the apex court affirmed decisions of the lower courts, stressing that Kebbi state governor failed to act in accordance with the law and due process.